Friday, May 23, 2008

Thompson case under investigation by DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility

The U.S. Department of Justice has acknowledged in a letter to U.S. Rep. John Conyers that its Office of Professional Responsibility has opened an investigation into four cases of alleged selective or politicized prosecution, including the case of Georgia Thompson.

The letter was posted at Talking Points Memo.

Conyers, D-N.Y., U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin, D-Madison, and two others sent a letter to the department last month urging a review of the Thompson case and three others.

Thompson was prosecuted by U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic on a charge of steering a state contract to a travel company whose executives contributed to Gov. Jim Doyle's campaign. Thompson was convicted in 2006, but the verdict was overturned on appeal. In the opinion reversing the conviction, one appeals court judge called the evidence used to prosecute Thompson "beyond thin." Biskupic has denied that political factors played any role in the prosecutor.

Thompson was given her job back, and Doyle signed a bill last month to pay nearly $229,000 in her legal fees.

See the letter from the U.S. DOJ:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/opr-conyers/?resultpage=1&

Labels:

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Doyle authorizes payment of Thompson's legal fees

Gov. Doyle signed legislation Tuesday authorizing nearly $229,000 in state money to cover Georgia Thompson's legal costs.

The new law is the final financial restitution for Thompson, who was convicted of rigging a state travel contract and served 18 months in prison before a federal appeals court overturned the conviction. She has already received lost wages from her position at the Department of Administration.

The bill was one of 11 signed into law by Doyle today.

See the press release: http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=120632

Labels:

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

State Claims Board backs legal fees for Thompson

The Wisconsin Claims Board says the state should cover more than $228,000 in legal fees for Georgia Thompson because her prosecution for bid ridding came about by virtue of her state employment.

"The legal fees, fines and assessments incurred in this matter are an obligation of the employer (State of Wisconsin) rather than its employee (Ms. Thompson)," the board wrote in its decision recommending $228,792.62 go to her attorneys.

Thompson was convicted in 2006 by a federal jury for steering a contract to a contributor of Gov. Jim Doyle's campaign. But that conviction was overturned at a federal court of appeals, with a judge calling the evidence "beyond thin."

Thompson's attorney Stephen Hurley applauded the decision.

"I'm very grateful that the board considered this and considered it so thoughtfully," Hurley said, calling it a "good resolution."

Thompson has been reinstated to her state job and already has received more than $67,000 in back pay for lost wages from the time she was forced to quit following her conviction until she was reinstated following the appeals court decision.

See the recommendation:
http://www.wispolitics.com/1006/071205ClaimsThompson.pdf

Labels:

Friday, June 15, 2007

Georgia Thompson files claim with the state

Department of Administration employee Georgia Thompson filed a claim with the state eeking reimbursement for nearly $360,000 in costs stemming from her prosecution and conviction on bid-rigging charges.

Thompson, who was rehired by DOA after the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals threw out her conviction in early April, seeks more than $206,000 in legal fees, $130,000 in taxes due on those fees and more than $14,000 in costs and disbursements. The claim also seeks just less than $10,000 for fines paid, preparation of her claim and assessments.

Thompson has already paid more than $162,000 of the legal fees owed, according to the claim.

"Reimbursement of a state employee's legal fees in a case such as this is appropriate and just," Thompson's lawyers write in the claim. "Payment will not undo the emotional trauma of such charges and wrongful incarceration, but it will help her put the pieces back together."

Thompson served four months of an 18-month sentence after her conviction by a Milwaukee jury for steering a state travel contract toward Adelman Travel. The case, prosecuted by U.S. Attorney Steven Biskupic, became the subject of Congressional hearings in the subsequent scandal over U.S. Attorney firings by the Dept. of Justice.

At the time of her acquittal by the federal court, Gov. Doyle indicated that Thompson would be eligible for reimbursement by the state for her legal fees.

Labels:

Monday, April 23, 2007

Circuit court releases written opinion in Thompson case

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago released its written opinion on the Georgia Thompson case Friday.

The court overturned Thompson's conviction two weeks before and released her from an 18-month prison sentence. She returned to work at the Department of Administration today, taking the position of assistant to the director of the Bureau of Risk Management. Thompson will earn a a salary of $77,300, plus full benefits. She will also receive $67,161.46 in back pay.

In the written opinion overturning her conviction, Chief Judge Frank Easterbrook wrote that Thompson was convicted of, at best, a mistake in calculating the scores of the travel companies involved, and that it could be argued a mistake was never made in the first place. Easterbrook also wrote that even a deliberate error is "a civil rather than a criminal transgression."

"What 'fraud' did Thompson commit, and who was the victim?," Easterbrook wrote. "Thompson did not bilk the state out of any money or pocket any of the funds that were supposed to be used to buy travel."

See the written decision:
http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/tmp/2I0TLBUE.pdf

Labels:

Monday, April 09, 2007

Appeals court overturns Georgia Thompson conviction

A federal appeals court in Chicago overturned Georgia Thompson's jury convictions in connection with the Adelman Travel case after one judge ridiculed the prosecution's theory as "beyond thin."

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals judges questioned the Department of Justice's Greg Haanstad why Thompson was even prosecuted. One judge also questioned the federal government's contention there were close political ties between Doyle and Adelman. Prosecutors pointed out company executives gave to Doyle's campaign and the governor spoke at an anniversary celebration the business held.

"Now, I have to say, at least in comparison to some of the cases this court has seen, that's a pretty thin set of facts to show some type of political relationship between Governor Doyle and the people who own Adelman travel," one judge said, later adding the evidence and case against Thompson were "beyond thin."

The judges said that it appeared to them that the Adelman bid was a statistical tie with others and that the U.S. attorney's office made no distinction between political favoritism and in-state favoritism.

"So the people you think were responsible for all this horsing around are Adelman and the governor, but she carries the sack," one judge said.

Haanstad said that if the case is taken as a whole, Thompson was responsible for misappropriation of state funds and the law required that she insulate the bidding process from political ties. The panel mostly asked Hurley for confirmation that Thompson did not know of any Adelman donations to Doyle and that the Adelman bid was the least expensive of those submitted.

*See the ruling:
http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/tmp/200XWA5O.pdf

*See the order to release Thompson:
http://www.wispolitics.com/1006/large/070404_Thompson_release_order.pdf

*Listen to a three-minute highlight of judges posing questions to the Haanstad:
http://www.wispolitics.com/1006/070405GThompsonAppeal.mp3

*Listen to the entire hearing:
http://www.wispolitics.com/1006/070405_Thompson_Dismissal.mp3

Michelle Jacobs, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's office in Milwaukee, said no decision has been made on an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

"We convinced the jury and we convinced (U.S. District Court) Judge (Rudolph) Randa that she was guilty, but obviously we didn't convince the appeals court," Jacobs said. "Her lawyers did a very good job, and we commend them and respect the decision of the court of appeals."

Thompson attorney Stephen Hurley said he did not expect prosecutors to appeal, saying "you don't get a message much more clear than this." Hurley attended an oral argument in Chicago this morning and received news of the verdict before he completed the drive back to Madison. He said similar decisions usually take at least four months.

"I think it sounded like they didn't buy the government's theory and they didn't buy the notion that there was any evidence to support that theory," said Hurley.

*See the statement from the U.S. attorney's office:
http://www.wispolitics.com/1006/070405USDOJThompson.pdf

*See Hurley's statement:
http://www.wispolitics.com/1006/070405_Hurley_Statement.pdf

Thompson began serving an 18-month sentence Nov. 27 at a federal prison near Peoria, Ill. Randa signed an order today requiring Thompson to be released on her own recognizance. The order states she can live in the Western District of Wisconsin "pending ultimate resolution of the mandate issued by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals." The appeals court wrote in its order that a ruling would be issued in "due course" and required that Thompson be released by the close of business today.

Hurley said there would not be a civil case filed against the federal government over the prosecution.

"There is no recourse against the United States government when they are wrong. Nor apparently is there an apology," he said.

Gov. Doyle said Thompson could have her old job with the Department of Administration if she wants it and would be eligible for back pay for the time she has missed. In addition, she could be eligible for reimbursement by the state for her legal fees.

*See Doyle's statement following Thompson's conviction:
http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=64335

*View the original indictment:
http://www.wispolitics.com/1006/060124travelindictment.pdf

Labels:

Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Randa Denies Thompson Bail Pending Appeal

Former DOA employee Georgia Thompson will begin serving her 18 month prison term on Nov. 27, her bid to remain free pending appeal denied last week by U.S. Circuit Court Judge Rudolph Randa.

In his decision, Randa said Thompson and her attorneys failed to provide any legal evidence that would suggest her conviction would be overturned on appeal.

Thompson was convicted in June and sentenced in September for steering a state travel contract to a Milwaukee company that contributed to Gov. Jim Doyle's campaign. Prosecutors said Thompson pushed to have the contract awarded to Adelman Travel because she felt it would help her career. The defense argued that prosecutors never provided any proof that higher-ups pressured Tholmpson, or that she was aware Adelman executives supported Doyle.

Labels:

Friday, September 22, 2006

Judge Gives Former DOA Employee Thompson 18 Months for 'Serious Offense'

By David A. Wise
WisPolitics.com

A federal judge in Milwaukee today sentenced former DOA civil servant Georgia Thompson to 18 months in prison, a $4,000 fine and three years of supervised release, saying that citizens "deserve good and honest government."

Judge Rudolph Randa cited recent cases of corruption and said, "there's been too much of this lately" in explaining his decision.

When the sentence was announced, one of Thompson's supporters broke into tears. Thompson didn't react visibly, but turned and asked her lawyer a question about appeals. Thompson is due to report for her sentence on Nov. 27. Randa said he would decide within the next two weeks on a defense motion to let Thompson stay free on bail pending appeal.

In June, a federal jury found Thompson guilty on two felony counts for steering a state travel contract to a Milwaukee travel company whose executives donated to Gov. Jim Doyle. She faced a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

The prosecution was seeking two years in prison; her attorney was asking that she receive probation.

Thompson's attorney, Stephen Hurley, today pointed to other public corruption cases in which defendants who've "lined their pockets" have gotten lighter sentences than the prosecution recommended.

Hurley argued Thompson has led "a good and law-abiding life characterized by extremely hard work and dedication."

Hurley said Thompson was at no risk to re-offend and that the only reason to imprison her would be for a deterrent effect for others. Hurley mentioned Thompson lost her job, her home and suffered public humiliation.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Scott Campbell agreed with Hurley's assessment of Thompson's character, but disagreed that she did not benefit personally.

"She cheated the state and the people of her honest services," Campbell said. "And she did it to enhance her standing at work."

Campbell added that her public humiliation shouldn't be considered in sentencing. "It's not the press' job to punish people," Campbell said.

Campbell told the court that a lenient sentence "would send a message that the federal court in Wisconsin doesn't take public corruption seriously."

In making his decision, Randa called Thompson's actions a "serious offense" and noted that in at least one case that Hurley cited the defendant received a break for cooperating with officials. Recent coverage of high-profile cases "shows there's a deterrent in place," Randa said, but added that each case had to be judged separately.

Randa acknowledged to Thompson that "you suffered greatly from this" but added, "this comes with every sentencing."

Randa also commented on Thompson's character, citing letters he received from friends and co-workers of Thompson. Randa noted how she received praise for handling her job well and for working late, often on weekends. Randa said he agreed with the jury verdict, but said he didn't agree with the government's contention that she gained personally.

Randa's sentence of 18 months came after the prosecution adjusted its request downward from 24 months to 21 months. The prosecution's initial brief sought 24 months, citing "penalty enhancers" like Thompson abusing the public trust, causing a loss greater than $30,000 and obstructing justice by perjuring herself.

But the defense argued that it is impossible to calculate exactly how much loss she allegedly caused, putting the figure around $5,000.

Campbell called the $30,000 figure "conservative" and said Omega lost over $250,000 in profits. Redoing the RFP process would cost more than $30,000 alone, he said.

Randa sided with the government on the money figure and agreed that Thompson abused the public trust. Randa, however, characterized a statement the defense called perjury as "a harmless falsification" that did not sway the jury.

It was after Randa ruled that Thompson had not perjured herself that the prosecution adjusted its recommendation downwards.

Labels:

Thompson Gets 18 Month Sentence

A federal judge in Milwaukee today sentenced former DOA civil servant Georgia Thompson to 18 months in prison, a $4,000 fine and three years of supervised release.

In June, a federal jury found Thompson guilty on two felony counts for steering a state travel contract to a Milwaukee travel company whose executives donated to Gov. Jim Doyle.

She faced a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. In a brief filed yesterday, the prosecution requested a sentence of two years in prison. Earlier, the defense had requested probation for Thompson.

Read pre-hearing briefs filed this week in the case: http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=72572

Labels:

Thompson Sentencing Hearing Today

The sentencing hearing for convicted former DOA employee Georgia Thompson started at 9:30 a.m. in Milwaukee today.

In June, a federal jury found Thompson guilty on two felony counts for steering a state travel contract to a Milwaukee travel company whose executives donated to Gov. Jim Doyle. She faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

In a brief filed yesterday, the prosecution requested two years in prison and also asked the judge to deny her request for bail pending appeal. Earlier, the defense had requested probation for Thompson.

Read pre-hearing briefs filed this week in the case: http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=72572

Labels:

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Biskupic Answers Thompson Motion for Acquittal

U.S. Attorney Stephen Biskupic filed a response this week to Georgia Thompson's request for an acquittal or new trial. Thompson is the former DOA employee who was convicted in June of steering travel contract bids to Adelman Travel, a business whose owners contributed to Gov. Jim Doyle's campaign.

In the response, Biskupic lays out a blow-by-blow account of the trial and evidence presented to refute Thompson attorney Stephen Hurley's assertion that the jury convicted her without "any direct or 'smoking gun' evidence."

Biskupic says that Thompson knew of the connection between Doyle and Adelman, and that motivated her actions.

"Georgia Thompson was aware of that relationship, perceived Adelman Travel to be the politically favored choice of the Doyle Administration, and as a result took extreme affirmative steps to rig the bid in favor of Adelman Travel," says Biskupic in the filing.

"That there was a significant political connection between Adelman Travel andthe upper-levels of state government - including Governor Doyle and his staff, as well as DOA Secretary Mark Marotta - cannot seriously be questioned," says Biskupic.

Thompson's own statements remove the jury's decision from the realm of inference to the level of proof, Biskupic argues.

"The pervasiveness of these connections strongly supports an inference that Thompson knew that they existed. And her statements remove any doubt as to whether Thompson believed that Adelman Travel was the administration’s politically favored choice. While the travel contracts were being evaluated, Thompson told others involved in the evaluation process that, for political reasons, the contract could not go to Omega."

Hurley had no comment on the filing today. Thompson is scheduled to be sentenced Sept. 22. She faces a maximum of 20 years in prison.

Labels:

Friday, July 21, 2006

Attorney Says Thompson Verdict Shows Bias Against Politicians, Seeks Acquittal or New Trial

Comments made to the media by two jurors show that they convicted Georgia Thompson based on inference, not fact, according to a brief filed this week by the former Department of Administration employee's lawyer.

Attorney Stephen Hurley says in the brief "the government did not produce any direct or 'smoking gun' evidence of Georgia Thompson's alleged wrong-doing. Instead, the government's case layered inference upon speculation upon inference and relied on the public's underlying bias against politicians (and public servants) - believing all politicians to be crooks - to obtain a guilty verdict."

Hurley cites comments from juror Marvin Bizelle, Sr., who according to Hurley "stated the jury believed higher ranking administration officials, including Governor James Doyle, were involved in the RFP Partner contract's award to Adelman Travel Group." Bizelle's statements were not supported by evidence at the trial, Hurley said, or by comments made by U.S. Atty. Steven Biskupic.

A federal jury found Georgia Thompson guilty on two felony counts today for steering a $750,000 state travel contract to a Milwaukee travel company whose executives donated to Gov. Jim Doyle.

Thompson faces up to 20 years in prison when sentenced on the two felony fraud counts for causing the misapplication of funds and participating in a scheme to defraud the state of Wisconsin of the right to honest services. She is scheduled to be sentenced Sept. 22.

The brief also argues that the state did not prove criminal conduct, did not prove that Thompson gained personally from her actions, or that there was any wrongdoing by her superiors or subordinates.

The prosecution has 30 days to file a response.

Labels:

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Defense Pushes for Acquittal, New Trial in Thompson Case

Defense counsel for Georgia Thompson, the former Department of Administration employee convicted on two federal fraud charges in connection with a state travel contract, cited a lack of evidence and took aim at some of Judge Rudolph Randa's rulings in a motion filed Monday seeking Thompson's acquittal or a new trial.

Thompson's lawyer, Stephen Hurley, argues in his filing that there was not enough evidence to support Thompson's conviction because no testimony showed influence on Thompson from her superiors to award the contract to a particular vendor, nor was there testimony that showed her bosses actually favored Adelman Travel Group, which was awarded the contract after a best and final offer procedure was used.

Hurley also argues that the prosecution failed to show personal gain on Thompson's behalf and that "at best, the evidence demonstrates a violation of the applicable sections of the Wisconsin Administrative Code" which he says is insufficient to support federal charges.

Hurley further agues that there was no testimony from DOA procurement specialist Dave Webb, who conducted the best and final offer procedure, about Thompson's conduct.

In the filing, Hurley takes issue with Randa's rulings on the admissibility of evidence based on witnesses' perceptions of Thompson's motivation for certain actions. Hurley says "such testimony was premised on speculation and conjecture regarding Georgia Thompson's intent." Hurley cites a 7th Circuit Court of Appeals decision that said "Speculation,'funny' looks, and 'raised eyebrows' are not sufficient to convict people for knowingly participating in a scheme to defraud."

Hurley makes similar arguments in asking for a new trial. He argues testimony by several witnesses, admitted over his objections, was based on speculation and hearsay.

Hurley requested the court allow him 30 days to file a supporting brief, another 30 days for the government to respond and an additional five days to respond to the government's objections.

Read the filing: http://www.wispolitics.com/1006/060620acquittal.pdf

Labels:

Monday, June 12, 2006

Bablitch: Thompson Acted on Her Own

DOA Secretary Steve Bablitch met with reporters at the federal courthouse and first read from a statement.

"The jury found in this case that the process was manipulated to benefit a particular bidder," Bablitch said. "Such behavior is incompatible with continued employment at this agency. Anyone convicted of a felony will not work in this administration."

He added there will be a review process but would not make any announcements about it today.

Bablitch said Thompson acted on her own and stressed she was not pressured from anybody else.

"Even the prosecutor said this is Miss Thompson acting on her own and there was not pressure from anybody else," he said.

Bablitch said the bidding process was fair, impartial and fundamentally sound.

"There was no evidence whatsoever that the governor had anything to do with this. I don't think it will harm the governor," he said.

Labels:

Green: Ban Contributions from Companies Bidding for Contracts

Following the verdict, U.S. Rep Mark Green, the Republican candidate for governor, issued the following statement:

"Last October, I called for a new state law that would prohibit contributions to a governor's campaign while a company is bidding to do state work. Elect me governor, and I will take steps to reassure taxpayers that campaign contributions are not influencing state procurement decisions."

See Green's release: http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=64336

Labels:

Doyle: Thompson to Be Fired, No Other State Employee Involved

Statement from Gov. Jim Doyle's office:
"As I have stated before, I have zero tolerance for ethical lapses in government. When public servants abuse the public's trust, they forfeit their rights to continue in the state's employ.

"While I have never met Georgia Thompson, I had, and continue to have, tremendous faith in our state workers, and the men and women who work at the Department of Administration. I had every expectation that the allegations against her would be proven wrong.

"However, as a former prosecutor and Attorney General, I respect our judicial process and the work juries do. In this case, the jury has spoken, and we will take appropriate action.

"Public employees are entrusted with using taxpayer dollars to pursue the public good. At all times, they must take action that falls squarely within the public's interest.

"Obviously when a person is convicted of a crime related to their duties, their employment must be terminated. I have instructed Secretary Bablitch to take swift action to resolve this matter.

"I have been carefully briefed of the testimony at the trial, and from the evidence presented by both the prosecution and the defense, it is clear that Georgia Thompson acted on her own and that no other state employee was involved."

Labels:

Biskupic Expects 'Aggressive' Appeal from Defense

Defendant Georgia Thompson stared straight ahead as the guilty verdict was read and seemed distraught as she left the courtroom. Her attorney, Stephen Hurley, ushered her past reporters, and supporters surrounded her as she left the building. One of them chided a camera man, "Shame on you."

Hurley said he had no comment.

U.S. Attorney Steven Biskupic said what made this case unique was that no personal gain was alleged for Thompson. Biskupic said that fact made the case "unique" and "difficult."

Biskupic said he would expect Hurley to "aggressively appeal" on that aspect of the case.

The jury deliberated for about four hours.

Thompson faces a maximum of 20 years in prison when sentenced Sept. 22, just more than six weeks out from the general election. But Biskupic predicted she will get far less than the maximum.

He also said he would meet with Dane County District Attorney Brian Blanchard and Wisconsin Department of Justice Deputy Attorney General Dan Bach later this week to assess the investigation.

But he cautioned against reading anything into that meeting.

Investigators have also been looking at donations Doyle received from executives of companies involved in the sale of the Kewaunee nuclear power plant. The sale was initially rejected by state regulators but later approved after several modifications. Doyle received $41,500 from utility executives shortly after the deal was rejected.

Biskupic said he worked with Blanchard, Bach and former acting U.S. Attorney Steve Sinnott of the Western District, and their joint conclusion was that the charges were warranted.

Biskupic, a GOP appointee, also tried to dispel complaints that the investigation was a partisan attack on the Doyle administration. He said in cases like these "the public needs to be assured it wasn't conducted in a partisan manner."

"The group that investigated this case had no preset agenda," Biskupic said.

Labels:

Jury Finds Thompson Guilty on Both Counts

A federal jury found Georgia Thompson guilty on two felony counts today for steering a $750,000 state travel contract to a Milwaukee travel company whose executives donated to Gov. Jim Doyle.

Thompson faces up to 20 years in prison when sentenced on the two felony fraud counts for causing the misapplication of funds and participating in a scheme to defraud the state of Wisconsin of the right to honest services.

Labels:

Jury Reaches Verdict in Thompson Trial

The jury in the Georgia Thompson trial has reached a verdict.

It is expected to be announced in federal court in Milwaukee within the next 15 minutes.

Labels:

Jury Deliberations Continue

Jury deliberations are continuing as of 3 p.m.

Labels:

Jury Deliberations Begin

After a morning of closing arguments from each side, the case is now in the hands of the jury.

Judge Rudolph Randa denied a government motion to bar two defense exhibits from going to the jury.

Both were related to employee discipline and protections. One manual was never introduced, but the other, a handbook Thompson would have received during training, will go back to the jury.

Labels:

Biskupic Rebuttal: Proof is in Thompson's Own Words

In his rebuttal, Prosecutor Steven Biskupic told jurors to look at the events of the March 3 meeting and take into account statements attributed to Thompson that suggested she used political considerations in arguing in favor of Adelman.

"The proof is in the defendant's own words," Biskupic said. "If she made these statements then her testimony was a bunch of lies."

Biskupic said jurors need to look at the evidence as a whole and criticized Hurley for pointing out the fact that the witnesses couldn't remember exact words of alleged statements. Biskupic said there will always be differences in witnesses' statements, but that jurors have "evaluate them all together."

"It's the evidence that convicts," Biskupic said. "Her words to the other people on the committee March 3." Biskupic said the witnesses statements regarding political considerations are "not speculation, not suspicions, it's what she said."

Biskupic told the jury it did not have to prove that "someone got to her" and pressured her to favor Adelman, just that she thought the award to Adelman would favor her bosses.

"What a coincidence that it actually did."

Labels:

Defense: Witness Recall of Key Meeting Unclear

Hurley said there was one thing the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt -- that no one could recall what precisely was said in that March 3, 2005 meeting.

Witnesses testified that Thompson said something about political considerations in regard to the contract, but "nobody remembers the same words," Hurley said.

"They remember not their words, but impressions," he said.

Specifically, Hurley attempted to cast doubt on Ian Thomas' testimony. He said when prosecuting attorneys asked him to repeat what he recalled Thompson saying, Thomas "shifted from side-to-side in his seat."

The night before the meeting, Thompson realized that she had been unfair to Adelman's presenters and graded them on factors not present in the RFP. "She scored style over substance," he said, adding she was afraid the mistake would cause her to have to throw out four years of work.

To describe what happened the next day at the meeting, Hurley said, "I can only quote from Cool Hand Luke, 'What we have here is a failure to communicate.'"

When committee member Lisa Clemmons suggested the best and final offer process to resolve the dispute, "Georgia grabbed that as a lifeline," Hurley admitted.

And, he said, while the meeting was very contentious, the members seemed to be in agreement by the end that the best and final stage should be carried out.

But soon complaints began, and when two commissioners went to Thompson's supervisor Helen McCain to raise their concerns with her, McCain told them to reconvene the committee and air them out.

"But they didn't do that," Hurley said. "What they did was start acting like a high school clique picking on someone who offended them."

As for the interview with WKOW-TV, Hurley said Thompson's statements are consistent with her court testimony. Except, he said, "she had the good sense not to air her suspicions and air her dirty laundry on Channel 27 like the others had."

Concluding his nearly hour-long summation, Hurley strode back to the defense table, where he put his arm on Thompson's shoulder and reminded them of McCain's words. "Georgia Thompson is what all of us should want in a public employee,' he said.

Labels:

Hurley Defends Scoring Differences

Hurley took time in his presentation to discuss government evidence that showed Thompson's score on Adelman's oral presentation was higher than the others.

Hurley said testimony showed that the others were angry at Adelman for presenting on an online contract for which it was not considered and scored the company lower because of it. Their scores also reflected that they didn't like the presenter, he said. Hurley said the others were using criteria not in the RFP, such as "likeability and the wow factor."

Hurley pointed to several contracts on which one member scored a particular vendor higher that others. Hurley said the government would assert that those people were "up to no good" also.

Hurley suggested that the reality is that scorers each had their own area of expertise and their scores reflected that.

In the case of the partner contract, Hurley said others were concerned about the UW System, but Thompson, who would have to implement the program, was concerned about all the state agencies.

"So she necessarily had a different perspective," Hurley said.

Labels:

Hurley Says Gov't Investigation Incomplete

Hurley criticized the government for not looking at the whole picture while conducting its investigation. Hurley pointed out that the government introduced phone calls between the DOA and Adelman. But he said they didn't look for evidence of calls between the DOA and other travel agencies.

Hurley told the jury "the government asks you to speculate that Georgia Thompson was directing David Webb's every move," and said the only evidence the government produced was that their cubicles shared a wall.

While the prosecution never brought it up, a best and final step was envisioned from the outset because it was included in the project's charter, Hurley said. And, he said, prosecuting attorneys never asked Lisa Clemmons whether she was in fact the one who suggested the bid go to a best and final offer stage. Instead, they say that Thompson "advocated" that the best and final be evaluated on a cost-only basis, which they alleged would favor Adelman over Omega.

"There is no shred of evidence Georgia advocated for a cost-only best and final," Hurley said.

Labels:

Defense: 'No Substance, No Proof' for Prosecution Case

Defense Attorney Stephen Hurley didn't mince words when he took to the podium to sum up his case.

"There is a place in the law for common sense," he said emphatically.

When the government charges someone with a crime, it has the burden of proof. He said that in this case, "they have offered no substance, no proof."

All they have provided, is "parts of a case while avoiding the big picture." Their case amounts to witness testimony of what her suspected motives were.

"We can't convict anyone on suspicion and certainly not the suspicion of other people," he said. "There is no proof whatsoever Georgia was told anything by her superiors."

Labels:

Prosecution Wraps Up Closing Statement; Defense Up Next

After the prosecution took just under an hour to close its case, defense attorney Stephen Hurley is up to argue his side.

Labels:

Prosecution: Thompson Did Not Make Merit-Based Argument Until Trial

Haanstad said she had the opportunity to step up after the oral presentations and to step up and argue in favor of Adelman based on merit at the March 3 meeting. Haanstad said she didn't do so then or when she gave a TV interview several months later.

After this statement Haanstad replayed a portion of her WKOW interview and said that "it wasn't until she came here to trial that she offered a merit-based reason" to select Adelman.

Haanstad told the jury that when the revised cost proposals came in that the final scores were 0.7 points apart. Haanstad recounted testimony by Thompson where she said she was directed by her boss, Pat Farley, and legal counsel to instruct Dave Webb to count this as a tie. Haanstad then showed a portion of the WKOW tape that seemed to contradict her testimony.

Summing up, Haanstad said that without Thompson's actions, Adelman would not have won the contract.

"Her job was to insulate that process from those political pressures. Instead she manipulated the process and subverted it for those pressures," he said.

Labels:

Prosecution: Case Comes Down to Credibility

Assistant US Attorney Gregory Haanstad opened the government's closing argument by arguing the case is about a defendant who steered a contract because of "improper political considerations."

Haanstad methodically laid out the case for the nine men and three women in the jury box, who listened attentively and read the PowerPoint presentation on flat-screen monitors mounted before them.

Haanstad said Thompson "manipulated a lucrative state contract to Adelman Travel" when she realized that the business, whose executives had donated money to Gov. Jim Doyle's campaign, would not receive any of the state travel contracts her committee was considering.

Haanstad said Thompson manipulated the process by inflating her scores for Adelman, pressuring others to do so and advocating for a best and final offer process that would take the final evaluation away from the committee. He also said she manipulated the scores of the best and final offer by rounding decimals in favor of Adelman and bending a tie-breaking procedure in the company's favor.

Haanstad said the case comes down to the credibility of witnesses presented by the prosecution vs. Thompson.

The prosecution witnesses corroborate one another's testimony, which is supported by documents, he said. Thompson, he said, has been inconsistent in her explanations of the events over time, from the initial process to the WKOW-TV interview she gave to her court testimony.

"Her version changes over time," Haanstad said.

Haanstad argued that after the oral presentations that Thompson saw the writing on the wall and knew Adelman wouldn't be awarded the partner contract. Haanstad recounted testimony by Ian Thomas. "This is where you're going to have to weigh the credibility of witnesses. Ian Thomas says, 'I don't know how I'm going to tell my bosses it's not Adelman.' Georgia Thompson denied making that statement."

Haanstad said regardless of the exact words used, that those who testified took Thompson to mean she was concerned with the political consequences of not awarding the contract to Adelman.

Haanstad said that Thompson admitted to changing her own score on the athletics travel contract based on "political considerations and criteria not stipulated in the RFP," and that she encouraged others to do the same for Adelman on the partner contract.

Labels:

Judge Approves Jury Instructions

Judge Rudolph Randa made his final decision on jury instructions in the trial of Georgia Thompson this morning.

Before he made his decision, attorneys in the trial argued for various versions of language to be included. Both sides sparred over the definition of honest services fraud and how it relates to proposal evaluation committees in Wisconsin.

Now that Randa has approved the instructions, closing arguments are set to begin. The prosecution is going first.

Labels:

Friday, June 09, 2006

Final Decision on Jury Instructions to Come Monday

Prosecution and defense attorneys spent the afternoon hashing out the instructions for the jury, but they couldn't quite come to a complete agreement before quitting for the day.

The attorneys said they were still going back and forth over the definition of honest services fraud.

Once they agree on all aspects of the proposed instructions, they will forward their recommendation to Judge Rudolph Randa and he'll decide on the instructions at a hearing at 8:30 a.m. Monday.

Labels:

Jurors Sent Home for the Weekend

Randa has sent the jury home until 9 a.m. Monday morning.

After the jury had seen the tape of the TV interview, Biskupic moved a couple more exhibits into evidence, then rested his case. Randa said he expects both the jury instruction conference with the lawyers and the closing arguments to be lengthy. As he dismissed them, Randa told jurors to ignore any media coverage they may see over the weekend.

After a break, the two sides will try to decide on jury instructions.

Labels:

Judge Allows Jury to See Tape of WKOW Interview

After watching a tape of WKOW reporter Tony Galli interviewing Georgia Thompson, Judge Rudolph Randa ruled that he would allow it to be presented to the jury, but with some instructions.

U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic wanted to use it in his rebuttal, but defense attorney Stephen Hurley objected because he said it contains incorrect information from the reporter and improper questions that ask Thompson to guess what other committee members were thinking. Hurley suggested the problem areas be edited out, then he would withdraw his objection.

Biskupic argued that the jury could be instructed to disregard any questions or statements from the reporter, and to focus on the defendant's answers.

After watching the tape, the judge said there were some misstatements of fact by the interviewer, at least according to the facts as presented at trial. He is instructing the jury that any information on the tape may not be considered as evidence if it conflicts with information heard and seen in the courtroom.

Hurley also wanted it made clear that the third person on the tape was a public information officer for DOA, not one of Thompson's lawyers. The judge made that part of his instructions to the jury.

The jurors are watching the tape on small, flat-screen TVs mounted in front of each of their seats.

Labels:

Defense Rests; Prosecution Plans Rebuttal

Once Hardiman finished his testimony, the defense rested its case.

Biskupic has said he will have a brief rebuttal. First there will be a lunch break until 1:35 p.m.

As he was leaving the courtroom, Biskupic said he anticipates showing the jury the WKOW-TV interview with Georgia Thompson. He said, however, there is a defense objection to it.

Labels:

Defense Witness Says Thompson Set Up 'Collaborative Environment'

The defense has decided to call one more witness, Mike Hardiman, director of purchasing services at UW-Madison.

Hardiman worked with Thompson on a different committee in 2003-04, and had five meetings with her. He said that Thompson set up Òa very collaborative environmentÓ in the meetings.

In cross, Biskupic asked approximately how many hours those five meetings totaled. Hardiman said about 12. He also said he and Thompson have not worked together since, and they don't socialize.

Labels:

Witness Testifies About Civil Service Protections from Political Pressure

Next up is Michael Soehner, who works in the Office of State and Employee Relations. He will testify that according to state law and administrative regulations, as well as Thompson's good performance evaluations, she could not have been disciplined or terminated except for just cause. The prosecution has tried to establish that Thompson rigged bids on the travel contract for partisan political reasons and to benefit her employment status.

In direct examination, Hurley asked Soehner what would happen if a political appointee tried to pressure a civil servant into fixing a bidding process. If the employee resisted, it would not be considered "just cause" for punishing or firing the civil servant, Soehner said.

However, Soehner said, if the employee did cave in to the pressure and fix the process, that would be considered just cause for termination.

Hurley asked what would happen if a civil servant was fired because they refused to cooperate with the appointee. "I'd tell them they might as well hire them back because the arbitrator is going to put them back to work anyway," Soehner answered.

Labels:

Biskupic Plans Short Rebuttal, If Any

Asked during a break in the trial if he will mount a rebuttal, U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic answered "If there is it'll be very short."

Labels:

McCain Talks About Political Pressure in Previous State Job

Under redirect, Hurley asked McCain if in her years of working in state government she'd ever felt pressured by a higher-up political employee to steer anything a certain way. She recalled that when she was in the Department of Development, which then oversaw the Department of Tourism, there was a much sought-after advertising contract up for bid.

She remembered there were "clearly some desires on the part of certain persons," but the agency involved did not get the contract.

Then McCain put a finer point on it. "I never had anyone for whom I have worked come to me and say, 'Helen, this has to happen.' That's never happened."

Labels:

McCain: Committee Member Was Concerned About Travel Contract

Under cross, McCain agreed that it would be improper for a person to suggest others change scores on non-merit based reasons. McCain agreed it would violate rules if a person who favored a specific vendor pushed an RFP to a best and final offer stage to give that vendor another chance.

Prosecutor Scott Campbell asked her questions repeatedly to show she did not know the specifics of the of the March 3 meeting.

McCain recounted a conversation with Nettesheim, who came to her with concerns over the contract award. McCain said Nettesheim told her Thompson said the Omega award "wouldn't fly politically."

McCain said she was concerned about that, but said such a comment "could have meant a lot of different things, none of them good."

After receiving an e-mail from Nettesheim's boss, UW System Associate Vice President for Financial Administration Doug Hendrix, that said further information on concerns about the contract would "come from higher levels," she thought the concerns were being dealt with.

McCain disagreed that she intended to look further into the partner contract when she moved from the UW System to DOA in April 2005. Prior to that move, McCain was director of purchasing at the UW System.

McCain reiterated that she thought it was being handled and added, "like you said, I was not privy to everything that was in that meeting."

Labels:

McCain Discusses DOA-UW System Tension

McCain highlighted the tension between the DOA and the UW System. McCain said the university often has special procurement needs and due to the volume of purchasing they engage in, that universities feel they can get a better deal using university consortium than by buying through the state. "They are not always thrilled" to be tied to the state, McCain said.

She said committee member Bridget Nettesheim approached her about her concerns with the partner travel RFP process, and the fact it was going to a best and final offer. "She felt it might be illegal," McCain said. Nettesheim said committee members told her they felt pressured into changing their scores, and that the contract was being directed to a particular vendor.

McCain told the concerned commissioners to request another meeting with the committee to put the issues on the table or put their concerns in writing. The meeting never took place.

McCain said she is the one who proposed the raise for Thompson, based on the difficult projects she had taken on and the long hours she dedicated to her job.

McCain said Thompson was "person of high integrity" who is a committed and hard worker.

"She is exactly what we folks should want in a state employee," McCain said.

Labels:

Purchasing Director Discusses Scoring Rules

In Milwaukee today, the first witness of the fifth day of the Georgia Thompson trial is Helen McCain, director of state purchasing for the Department of Administration. She has worked in state government for 31 years. McCain will testify that state regulations encourage RFP evaluators to discuss their scores and that the rules permit and often encourage change of scores after discussion, according to an earlier filing from defense attorney Stephen Hurley.

The purpose of procurement and the RFP process is to "get the best value" for the state "because we're using taxpayer money," McCain said.

With prompting from Hurley, McCain discussed a hypothetical situation in which one evaluator's score for a vendor is significantly lower than the scores from other evaluators. She said it is appropriate for committee members to discuss their scores to figure out reasons for discrepancies.

McCain said members are allowed to ask others if they'd like to change their scores, but may not direct others to do so.

"You can't ask if they'd like to change their score - you can not direct anyone to change their score because (evaluators) are all equal," she said.

McCain said evaluators are permitted to go back and change scores on the written portion based on information obtained in the oral presention.

She also said evaluators are supposed to grade vendors on substance, not style. "You should score them based on whay they're showing you. You're not there to evaluate a vendor's personality, you're there to evaluate what they're presenting," she said.

Labels:

Thursday, June 08, 2006

Judge Disallows Some Defense Expert Testimony

As the federal "bid-rigging" trial of DOA civil servant Georgia Thompson entered its fourth day, Judge Rudolph Randa made a qualified ruling on a government motion to strike some expert defense witness testimony.

Randa said some of the opinions the experts were to give have already been heard by the court and would be "cumulative" and wouldn't aid the jury.

However, the judge said he would allow Helen McCain from the Bureau of Procument to testify on whether it is appropriate to move an RFP to a best and final offer stage when there is a point spread of 21 points.

Labels:

Closing Statements Could Come Monday

At the end of today's session, Judge Rudolph Randa said if the defense hadn't wrapped up its case by noon, he was inclined to let the two sides give their closing statements on Monday.

Defense attorney Stephen Hurley indicated he'd have two witnesses tomorrow, Michael Soehner, who works in the Office of State Employee Relations, and Helen McCain, the director of purchasing in the Bureau of Procurement at the DOA.

Prosecutor Steven Biskupic said that he has not decided if the state will mount a rebuttal case.

Labels:

Doyle Donor Says He Never Expected State Business In Return for Support

After nearly seven hours of testimony from defendant Georgia Thompson, the defense took less than seven minutes to question their second witness, Marathon Travel and Cruise owner John Noel.

Noel, of Stevens Point, and his family have given nearly $30,000 to Gov. Jim Doyle's campaign since 2002, and he served on a state board, the Economic Growth Council, appointed by Doyle. Noel's company also bid on the state travel contracts.

Hurley asked if Noel ever expected or received any quid pro quo from the governor for his support. He answered no, he hadn't.

Labels:

Thompson Explains Score Changes

Under re-direct, Thompson said she changed her scores on the oral presentations to correct for her judging based on style over substance.

Thompson said at the March 3 meeting that "no one clearly indicated to me at the meeting that they scored on style over substance." Thompson said she wouldn't accuse someone of improper conduct based on her suspicions.

Hurley asked Thompson why several contracts didn't go to the best and final offer stage. For most she indicated that they were contracts for specialty areas that had special service needs.

When asked about the partner contract Thompson said "if there ever was an example of when a best and final offer should be done, this is it."

Under re-cross, Biskupic asked Thompson about a spreadsheet that showed Adelman and Omega were tied. Biskupic noted that because Omega was scored a few decimal points higher, that it was listed above Adelman. He then asked Thompson why when the spreadsheet was passed up the chain, it was changed to list Adelman first.

Thompson replied that "it would have been Dave Webb" who changed them. She denied knowing that this happened and said "he could have been alphabetizing them."

Labels:

Prosecutor Asks Thompson About WKOW Interview

Defendant Georgia Thompson was also questioned in cross about an October 2005 interview with WKOW-TV in Madison. The prosecutor asked about comments she made to the reporter that indicated she had acted as an advocate for Adelman, and questions the reporter asked about the travel agency's contributions to the governor.

She claimed her recollection was hazy. "I was asked a number of questions in a very short time and it was a long time ago," Thompson said.

See the interview

Labels:

Prosecutor Questions Thompson's Story on Reconsidering Adelman Scores

Prosecutor Steven Biskupic opened his cross-examination by immediately tearing into Thompson's explanation that she asked committee members to reconsider their scores because she felt they had been treated unfairly.

He asked if on March 2, the day before the final scores were revealed, she had known that her fellow commissioners had treated Adelman unfairly, and that it had affected their scores. "I had it in my mind that it was possible," she said.

He asked the question several ways, and each time Thompson calmly said she did not know that the comissioners had downgraded Adelman on style rather than substance, but she suspected it because of negative comments she heard about the Adelman presenters.

"I think they perhaps scored more on emotion" than substance, she said.

Biskupic asked if that's why she asked the others to change their scores.

"I didn't ask people to change scores. I asked them if they wanted to reconsider their scores," she said. "I would have been content if they would have had the discussion."

Biskupic also questioned her about testimony by Ian Thomas, a consultant who worked with the committee. Thomas told the jury that he had a conversation with Dave Webb shortly before the March 3 meeting and informed Webb that Adelman had lost out on the contract. He said Webb's reaction was "Georgia's going to be upset."

Biskupic asked if Thompson had ever expressed a preference for Adelman to Webb, who worked in a cubicle next to her. She said she hadn't.

Thomas also alleged that Thompson told him that Pat Farley was "well-connected to the governor," and that Farley served on the governor's election committee. She denied saying it.

"When he attributed that to you, that's completely false?" asked Biskupic.

"Yes," said Thompson.

"You had no idea of Mr. Farley's political activities?" he asked.

"Correct," she responded.

Labels:

Cross-examination Set to Begin

After five hours with defendant Georgia Thompson on the stand, the defense finished questioning her shortly before 3 p.m. After a short break, the prosecution's cross-examination is due to start.

Labels:

Thompson Breaks Down While Describing Scoring Process

Georgia Thompson broke down this morning as she recounted for jurors her realization that she and other members of the travel contract evaluation committee rated Adelman Travel company more on their presentation than the substance of their offer.

The night before the members were to turn over their score sheets, Thompson said she went through and recalculated her numbers. It was then she realized that three days of committee members trashing the Adelman presentation had negatively affected her score. Thompson said she and other commissioners complained about the Adelman presenters' "abrasive" and "pushy" manner, and that they used much of their time pitching for an online travel contract they weren't even eligible for. She said, however, that judging a potential contract on criteria outside the RFP is a violation of state regulations.

As a consumer, she said, if you don't like a salesperson's personality, you can choose a different store. It doesn't work that way with the state, she said, as she broke into tears.

"In government, you can't say that. You can't say you don't like the presenter," she said. "You can not score them on whether you liked them or not."

Thompson said she adjusted her score, and the next day at the committee meeting asked the other members if they wanted to reconsider their marks.

"Everyone said no," she said. "Everyone stated that Omega was the clear winner."

Thompson testified that she continued to pursue her point until a coffee break was called. During the break, she was approached by her supervisor Pat Farley, who told her that the employee she had been working on a disciplinary action with for a year had agreed to retire.

Hurley asked if that wasn't a happy occasion.

"It meant I had to do all her work," said Thompson, choking up again as she did so. She also said that part of the employee's "separation agreement" included a retroactive promotion to a higher pay grade. "I thought it was a promotion she wasn't entitled to," Thompson said, wiping away tears.

Hurley asked if Farley had mentioned Adelman Travel or the contract process during their discussion. She said no.

When she returned to the meeting her demeanor had changed, Thompson said, acknowledging the testimony from prosecution witnesses. She said she was facing a meeting with Woodke at the end of the day in which she had to sign retirement documents. "I was upset - very upset," she said.

"I was also angry that they were so locked in on Omega and they couldn't give me a reason," she said. "I lost my composure."

She said she was considering going through legal channels to stop the procurement of the partner contract based on the unfairness of the bid scoring. When commissioner Lisa Clemmons mentioned that the bid should go to a best and final offer phase, Thompson agreed, seeing it as a solution to the problem.

In earlier testimony, prosecution witnesses said Thompson brought up at the meeting that she changed her score on the travel contract for university athletics. The witnesses said they thought she was looking for reciprocation for that on the Adelman bid, but Thompson said the reason she brought it up was because she was trying to illustrate to members that scores can change when new information comes to light.

She said during discussions for the athletics contract, she learned about the difference between NCAA team travel rules and requirements for Division 1-A schools. She said that changed her score for the vendors.

Labels:

Thompson: 'I'm Not a Political Person'

Thompson said she votes "sometimes," does not belong to a political party, and does not have bumper stickers on her car.

"I'm not a political person," she said.

She also said her contact with former DOA Secretary Marc Marotta was limited to quarterly department meetings, chance meetings in the elevator, and a presentation she gave to him and Gina Frank-Reese in the secretary's office. Their offices were four floors apart, and they were also separated by several management levels.

"I didn't know Marc Marotta,' she said.

Thompson said she told Marotta during the presentation the state could save $4.1 million per year with the proposed travel program. She said Marotta was "excited" by the presentation and the savings, and the program was greenlit shortly after her presentation.

Labels:

Thompson Recounts Stressful Work Environment

With Georgia Thompson's testimony, the defense is trying to portray her as a public official under tremendous strain because of a demanding workload, staffing shortages within her department and unpopular programs she was in charge of implementing.

Thompson told the jury that during the time of the state travel contract there were several positions below and above her that were vacant as the state faced a deficit of over $3 billion.

She said she was working on several state programs at the time, including implementing a state travel card and fuel card, and reducing the state's fleet by 1,000 vehicles. In addition to this she said she was working on an employee discipline problem and conducting over 70 interviews in an attempt to fill a vacant position.

When trying to reduce the state's vehicle fleet, Thompson said she had to send out teams to get vehicles agencies wouldn't turn over so she could put them on the auction block. Thompson said she received letters, phone calls and e-mails from legislators, union reps and other officials with issues regarding this and other programs.

Thompson said people were also resistant to using the travel and fuel cards because they could not collect the frequent flyer miles they would have in the past using personal cards, conduct Thompson said was "unethical."

Thompson described her workload as the source of the pressure she told Ian Thomas about during a conversation. She described her work as stressful and said "you get to a point where you question your own productivity" and that she worked long hours to keep up with the work.

She was also encouraged by supervisors to save money. "They were reaching out for ideas that would help save money and we were encouraged to do more with less," she said.

All of the programs she was trying to implement caused "pushback" from various agencies, according to Thompson. Thompson said she tried to deal with those pushing back by "accommodating them, working with them," and trying to meet them "halfway."

Thompson said the public sector was different from the private sector because when the state implements a program, many agencies refuse to cooperate. Thompson said there is a "degree of resistance to any change" in the public sector.

The last time an attempt was made to implement a state travel program was 12 years before, Thompson said. That attempt was met with considerable "pushback" from state employees, although it was optional at the time. This time the program would be mandatory, and she expected a lot of resistance.

"People take their travel plans very personally," she explained.

Thompson said the UW System, particularly the Madison campus, was a major source of pushback. Thompson said Madison, due to its size, "would take a harder stance" on what they would or wouldn't do regarding the implementation of various state programs. Thompson said there was "animosity between the university and the Department of Administration."

Thompson said the state's annual travel purchasing program is about $12 million, far less than corporate giants she dealt with in the private sector. General Electric, for instance, had a travel purchase program of more than $500 million when she worked with them in private agencies. Because of the state's small budget for travel, she didn't expect large travel providers to respond to the state's proposal.

She was also concerned the consolidation effort would hurt some small travel agencies, perhaps putting some out of business. This repercussion was discussed within the RFP development and contract evaluation committee, she said, and it was determined to go ahead with the program despite that.

Labels:

Thompson Called as First Defense Witness

Georgia Thompson took the stand in her own defense this morning, as the first witness called by the defense in her bid-rigging trial.

Thompson recounted her background in the travel business, working more than 25 years in Chicago, Philadelphia and Washington D.C.

In 2001, the Madison native returned home to a job as chief of the transportation travel division in the DOA, which was eliminated and moved into the Bureau of Procurement in July 2003. She told Hurley she took a $32,000 pay cut when she moved into the public sector.

Thompson said her designation as a "career executive" insulated her from appointed officials and that she could only be fired for just cause. Thompson said her designation protected her from having her salary reduced and the worst action a superior could take against her without cause would be to move her to another department.

Labels: